Protocol, only occupation of the deceased should not contain the behavior of heritage and hurt younger. Indeed, after his father’s past lives, I respect the Second Uncle as a home for the funeral arrangements for their elders, have not done any damage to his things. In order to secure bid farewell to his father; to preserve his and family honor.
I line every point of the ceremony, the Greek view can do so that everyone satisfied. Do not hesitate to lay down their dignity and rights. Informed him in the illegal disposal of the father’s estate, I only asked him to correct the violations, return to the heritage of this part, played down the matter. Is this normal and simple
Requirements of both the differences are almost sense it? Is giving up the things of their own, any person to occupy, use is the moral? So, although the defendants and their agents do distort the facts of responsibility, but we believe that this level of rhetoric, whether in law or in the moral level is untenable. Nonlet everyone says, justice